De color invisible. Paisajes de blanquitud y de identidad racial en el desarrollo internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35305/rea.viXXXI.216Palabras clave:
Desarrollo Internacional, Racializacion, AntropologiaResumen
La identidad racializada en relación con el campo del desarrollo internacional es un tema sorprendentemente sin analizar dentro de la antropología, si bien extensamente explorada en vinculación a las sociedades occidentales multiculturales contemporáneas y las relaciones históricas existentes entre diferentes partes del mundo. En este artículo exploro la raza y blanquitud en relación al desarrollo internacional, enfatizando la importancia de analizar como la construcción histórica de la identidad racial continua modelando las relaciones del presente de gente que pertenece a diferentes lugares geográficos. En función de captar la importancia del desarrollo en la vida visual y cotidiana de la gente en diferentes partes del mundo, utilizo el término “paisaje de desarrollo”. Para ello adapto la idea de la globalización Arjun Appadurai (1996) como consistiendo en diferentes “paisajes”, y además, me pregunto sobre cómo es racializado el “paisaje de desarrollo”.
Descargas
Citas
Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist 17(1): 41-55.
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In: Lenin and philosophy, pp. 127-186. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Berg, J.T. (2008). ‘“We are on development”: Discourses and lived experiences of the ICEIDA-supported programme in Malawi’. (Unpublished MA thesis) University of Iceland.
Bonnett, A. (2000). White identities: Historical and international perspectives. Essex: Prentice Hall.
Brack, D. (2007). Introduction: Trade, aid and security: An agenda for peace and development. In: Oli Brown, M.H., Peña Moreno, S. and Winkler, S. (eds), Trade, aid and security: An agenda for peace and development, pp. 1-17. London: Earthscan.
Brodkin, K. (2007). Desire for development: Whiteness, gender and the helping imperative. Ontario Wilfrid Laurier UP.
Brodkin, K. (2000). Global capitalism: What’s race got to do with it? American Ethnologist 27(2): 237-256.
Bruner, E.M. (2005). Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Crapanzano, V. (2003). Reflections on hope as a category of social and psychological analysis. Cultural Anthropology 18(1)3-32.
Cooper, F. (2005). Colonialism in question: Theory, knowledge, history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Duffield, M. (2006 [2002]). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. London: Zed Books.
Edelman, M. and Haugerud, A. (eds) (2005). The anthropology of development and globalization: From classical political economy to contemporary neoliberalism. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Ferguson, J. (1994). The antipolitics machine. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8(1): 45-63.
Harrison, F.V. (2002). Unraveling ‘race’ for the twenty-first century. In: MacClancy, J. (ed.), Exotic no more: Anthropology on the front lines, pp. 145-166. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Harrison, F.V. (1995). The persistent power of ‘race’ in the cultural and political economy of racism. Annual Review of Anthropology 24:47-74.
Hartigan, J.J. (1997). Establishing the fact of whiteness. American Anthropologist 99(3):495-505.
Heron, B. (2007). Desire for development: Whiteness, gender and the helping imperative. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Jacobson, M. (1998). Whiteness of a different color: European immigration and the alchemy of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kiely, R. (1999). The last refuge of the noble savage? A critical assessment of post-development theory. The European Journal of Development. Research 11(1):30-55.
Loftsdóttir, K. (2002). Never forgetting? Gender and racial-ethnic identity during fieldwork. Social Anthropology 10(3):303-317.
Loftsdóttir, K. (2004). ‘This time it’s different’: Globalization, power and mobility. In: Ingimundarson, V., Loftsdóttir, K. and Erlingsdóttir, I. (eds), Topographies of globalization: Politics, culture and language, pp. 149-162. Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan.
Loftsdóttir, K. (2008). The bush is sweet: Identity, power and development among WoDaaBe Fulani in Niger. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.
Loftsdóttir,K. and Björnsdóttir, Helga (2009). The ‘jeep-gangsters’ from Iceland: The merging of militaristic operations and international development. Critique of Anthropology 29(4).
Mascia-Lees, F.E., Sharpe, P., and Cohen, C.B. (1989). The postmodernist turn in anthropology: Cautions from a feminist perspective. Signs 15(1):7-33.
Nustad, K.G. 2001. Development: The devil we know? Third World Quarterly 22(4): 479489.
Moore, H.L. (1996). Passion for difference: Essays in anthropology and gender. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London and Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.
Mudimbe, V.Y. (1994). The idea of Africa (African systems of thought). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender and bodies out of place. Oxford: Berg.
Rigby, P. (1996). African images: Racism and the end of anthropology. Oxford: Berg.
Smedley, A. (1998). ‘Race’ and the construction of human identity. American Anthropologist 100(3): 690-702.
Staunæs, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. Nora 11(2): 101-110.
Tsing, A. (2000). The global situation. Cultural Anthropology 15(3): 327-360.
United Nations Development Project (UNDP) (2005). ‘International cooperation at a crossroads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world.’ http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/ (accessed March 2007).
Vitalis, R. (2000). The graceful and generous liberal gesture: Making racism invisible in American international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29: 331-356.
Publicado
Versiones
- 2022-12-30 (2)
- 2022-12-30 (1)
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Natalia Castelnuovo; Kristín Loftsdóttir
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
